RSS

Create Self-Destructing Emails With Bigstring

  • Bigstring EmailEver send an email to someone and wish you could take it back? Perhaps it was to the wrong person, maybe it contained incorrect information, or maybe you were a little angry when you wrote it. With Bigstring, you can call it back or even cause it to self-destruct.

    You have a few choices available when it comes to how you want something to be destroyed. You could set it to expire at a certain time, or after how many times the message has been viewed by the recipient.

    Bigstring Email

    Making the message hard to print is even possible, although I can’t lay claim to how reliable that is. A workaround that comes to mind is that someone could easily take a screenshot of the message and then print it, but maybe the recipient isn’t aware of that possibility.

    How does Bigstring do it?
    It converts your message into an image. So if you change your message, the image is retrieved from their server the next time it’s called up to display. When you delete a message, the image is removed, thus the email “shell” remains in the recipients inbox, but the message is no longer visible.

    How much does it cost?
    Well, even the free basic account has great features everyone would want to use: 2GB of storage, video emails, email tracking, non-forwardable/IP locking email, and lots more. If you want to pay, you’ll get all that and increased storage and a few other bells and whistles.

    [tags]email,security[/tags]

16 Comments
  1. #1 Christy (45 comments.) says:
    July 30, 2007 at 6:48 am

    If I understand this concept correctly this could be a lifesaver for those “heat of the moment” emails, lol.

  2. #3 Brown Baron (192 comments.) says:
    July 30, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    Now why am I starting to think of naughty emails? :mrgreen:

  3. Now that’s a darn good idea if I ever did see one! :grin:

    Shine on,
    Aaron

  4. #9 kRUZe says:
    August 1, 2007 at 1:40 am

    Great Idea, I wonder how many “image” only emails will be tagged as SPAM though?

    • #10 Mark says:
      August 1, 2007 at 9:56 pm

      Hi kRUZe, yeah, that’s one drawback I see to this whole technology. The other thing is that it causes the recipient to accept the images in order to display them if they have them turned off by default. A slight annoyance, but I think manageable.

  5. #11 Stephen Cronin (8 comments.) says:
    August 20, 2007 at 1:07 am

    Personally, I’d be annoyed if I received email like this! Do other people feel the same or is it just me?

    Another thing that this technology would mean is that you can’t and paste text in the email. I can see this would have benefits for some businesses (and spammers as spam keyword wouldn’t be picked up), but for most people I think it would bring more negatives than positives. My two and a half cents.

    • True, I think it should only be used under certain circumstances. Sensitive information perhaps and only on a personal level. Good points Stephen!

Ammunition Storage | Generators For Sale